Twisters

Summary

Since it was first revealed thatTwisters , aTwistersequel , was in the works , there have been many question about what this continuation will be about and who it will admit , and a late update finally gives some answers , while also lift a completely young issue . Twisteris a 1996 natural disaster film that come after a chemical group of storm chasers following a tornado , but in particular , a couple that is on the verge of divorcement . Twister 2,also calledTwisters , was first confirmed in 2022 and has lately finished filming . Twistersnew castincludes Glen Powell , Daisy Edgar - Jones , and Anthony Ramos .

During an interview withVogue , Glen Powell latterly reveal some apt information about his fresh labor , Twisters . He explained thatTwistersis a entirely standalone account . This means that , though it is a continuation to the originalTwister , it does not let in any of the original characters . In picky , Powell said , " It ’s definitely not a reboot . We ’re not seek to play the narration from the first one . It ’s a entirely original taradiddle . There are no characters from the original movie back , so it ’s not really a continuation . It ’s just its own standalone write up in the innovative - day . "

2024 ’s picture show dismission calendar has tidy sum of big continuation highlighting , but one follow - up to a 1996 box role strike will doubtlessly be the strangest .

Official poster for Twisters (2024)

Twisters Is Better Off Without Major Connections To The Original Movie

Ultimately , Glen Powell ’s gossip aboutTwistersis an exciting update . It is not often that a picture show is turned into a enfranchisement and the sequel is essentially completely garbled to its come before movie . Typically , particularly these days , celluloid franchises try severely to build up lore and story for audiences to get confiscate to . But , it is exciting thatTwistersis not follow this trend . In many ways , it will abide by the essence ofTwister , which is self-generated and individual . Plus , this unequaled move may gain the film more traction .

It is good forTwistersto stay separate from 1996’sTwisterbecause the franchise ’s stories do n’t require to join . Twisteris about an isolated incident , a natural disaster that one grouping of masses experience fount to face . In many way , it would be cheesy to try and bring back these characters and give them into another similar disaster . Instead , it constitute sensory faculty to try on and tell apart a exchangeable fib with a Modern cast . Therefore , audiences get to know the same thrills ofTwister’soriginal natural catastrophe but with all novel case who will throw off up the narrative .

Standalone Or Not, Will Enough People Care About Twisters?

However , Twisters’individuality does raise one substantial job . Without firm tie to its original movie , Twistersmight not be able to interest audience enough . In worldwide , Twisteris not a blockbuster . If anything , it is a cult classic , and the type of film that many watched but afterwards forgot about . In this way , make a enfranchisement out of it is already risky . However , now thatTwistersis not bring back any of the onetime characters , there might not be enough of a connexion to contribute inTwister - lovers . Therefore , Twisterswill have to swear on itself alone to bring in hearing .

Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton’s Jo and Bill Harding grab each other in a cornfield and stare at a tornado

Glen Powell next to Jo and Bill in Twister

Bill Paxton looking at the sky in Twister

Bill Paxton and Helen Hunt look at an approaching tornado while standing in a cornfield in Twister

Twisters

Twister