Society of the Snow

WARNING : spoiler beforehand for Society of the Snow .

Summary

AlthoughSociety of the SnowandAliveboth tell the true story of the survivors the the 1972 Andes airplane crash , there are several cardinal differences between the two films . Released more than 30 year ago in 1993,Alivewas directed by Frank Marshall , a prominent producer know for his work onThe Curious Case of Benjamin Button(2008),Signs(2002 ) , andRaiders of the Lost Ark(1981).Society of the Snowwas train by Spanish filmmaker J.A. Bayona , known for directingJurassic human race : Fallen Kingdom(2018),A Monster Calls(2016 ) , and the 2012 disaster movieThe out of the question .

Society of the Snowis Spain ’s official meekness for Best International Feature at the 2024 Academy Awards . It was released on January 4 , 2024 , on Netflix and has chop-chop become one of the most blab out about movies of the new year . Alivewas not necessarily a loge federal agency hit in 1993 , earning about $ 36.3 million at the domesticated box power from a product budget of $ 32 million . animated , however , did charm interview upon its release , butSociety of the Snowultimately offers a refreshful and closer linear perspective of the Miracle of the Andes with several tote up layers of naturalism .

bon ton of the Snow is nearly a completely accurate retelling of the tragic 1972 Andes plane clangor & survival story , but there are a few key changes .

Society of the Snow Netflix Movie Poster

12Numa Turcatti Has A Much Bigger Role In Society Of The Snow

Numa Turcatti , the last person to pop off off before the remaining 16 survivors were rescued in actual liveliness , has a much bigger role inSociety of the Snowthan he does inAlive . Numa is one of the main protagonists throughoutSociety of the Snowwho narrates the story as it is happening , whereasAlivehas a dissimilar storyteller told from another perspective .

11Society Of The Snow & Alive Were Based On Different Books

BothSociety of the SnowandAlivewere based on two of the dozens of books that were write about the 1972 Andes plane wreck by historians , journalists , and many of the survivors . The screenplay forSociety of the Snowwas based on the bookLa Sociedad de la Nievewritten by Pablo Vierci while the screenplay forAlivewas base on the 1974 bookAlive : The Story of the Andes Survivorswritten by British novelist Piers Paul Read .

10Alive Is Narrated By “Old Carlitos Páez” Played By John Malkovich

WhileSociety of the Snowis tell through the lens of Numa Turcatti , Alivebegins and ends with scenes of the character " Old Carlitos Páez " , one of the survivors played by John Malkovich . Old Carlitos recalls the scenario many year after it happened inAlivewhile Numa turn over a variety of spiritual recollection of the case since he decease inSociety of the Snow . The real Carlitos Páez wrote John Malkovich ’s demarcation inAlive .

All 16 survivors of the 1972 Andes plane clangor depicted in Society of the Snow went on to have fulfilling lives . Many spell books and became speakers .

9Society Of The Snow Actually Shot At The Real Andes Crash Site

Parts ofSociety of the Snowwere shot on location at the existent 1972 Andes airplane clangour site as well as in Uruguay , Chile , and Argentina . Alivewas in the first place filmed in the Canadian Rocky Mountain chain . While both sites achieved a signified of realism with their filming locations , it does n’t get more accurate than shooting literally where the tragical events of the film took place , which was call the Valley of Tears after the clash .

8Society Of The Snow Has Much More Graphic Scenes Than Alive

With 30 eld in betweenSociety and the SnowandAlive , it ’s no surprisal thatSociety of the Snowhas more graphic scenes than Alive does . Due to the changing conventions of what is acceptable to be express on movie , Society of the Snowis more pictorial and gory thanAliveand allows the story to be depicted with a more accurate sense of realismthan ever before .

7Society Of The Snow Is A More Accurate Depiction Than Alive

for the most part due to the bring layer of naturalism , Society of the Snowis a more accurate depiction of the genuine - lifespan events follow the 1972 Andes planing machine crash and 72 day of survival thanAliveis . Society of the Snowalso includes more additional details thanAlivedoesand recount more of an overall aboveboard narrative of the events as they in reality happen .

Society of the Snow retells the tarradiddle of the 1972 Andes carpenter’s plane crash with great truth , allowing the viewer to render the consequence for themselves .

6Society Of The Snow Has An Entirely South American Cast

One of the biggest criticisms ofAliveis that it features a mostly clean cast of American and Canadian actors who portray an entirely Uruguayan mathematical group of characters . AlthoughAlivefeatures great histrion such as John Malkovich and Ethan Hawke , Society of the Snowmakes up for the mostly ashen cast of characters by sport an exclusively South American cast of Argentine and Uruguayan actors .

5The Characters In Society Of The Snow Speak Mainly Spanish

Because of the exclusive casting of Argentine and Uruguayan actors inSociety of the Snow , the motion picture is distinguish entirely in Spanish , the linguistic process that the real - spirit passengers and subsister actually utter . Being a Hollywood moving-picture show , the dialogue inAliveis spoken totally in English , which does not capture the genuineness of the existent survivors and those who cash in one’s chips at all .

4Several Real-Life Passengers Are Not Depicted In Alive

Several real - life rider are not depicted inAlive , include Gaton Costemalle , Alexis Hounie , Guido Magri , Felipe Maquirriain , and Julio Martinez - Lamas . Society of the Snowdid an splendid chore in honoring most of the passengers and all of the survivors who survived the initial planer clank , although there were some changes made to the grapheme of the original and conscientious objector - pilot burner , and their figure are not used in the motion picture .

Society of the Snow tells the unbelievable true fib of the Miracle of the Andes . Because the film is so accurate , there are several pictorial scenes .

3Alive Does Not Include Real-Life Savior Sergio Catalán

Alivemakes several alteration to the existent - life rescue of the subsister , particularly how Roberto and Nando were first find by a Chilean man on horseback . Alivedoes not depict that scene or the man whose name is Sergio Catalán , butSociety of the Snowdoes include it and how they were actually distinguish and rescue . In real lifespan , Catalán tossed them a loaf of bread of bread and ride for hours to the cheeseparing town , which led to the rescue of the other 14 survivors .

society-of-the-snow-alive-movies-andes-disaster-true-story-differences

society-of-the-snow-movie-andes-disaster-true-story-changes-fact-check

Numa on the Plane Before the Crash in Society of the Snow

Cast of Alive 1993 inside crashed plane

Alive (1993) John Malkovich

Collage of characters from Society of the Snow

Daniel Maspons (Santiago Vaca Narvaja) climbing up a mountain in Society of the Snow.

Numa Turcatti (Enzo Vogrncic) seeing the approaching avalanche in Society of the Snow.

Susana ‘Susy’ Parrado (Alfonsina Carrocio) being held by Fernando ‘Nando’ Parrado (Agustín Pardella) in Society of the Snow.

society-of-the-snow-ending-explained

the survivors sitting in and around the broken fuselage in Society of the Snow

Gustavo “Coco” Nicolich (Blas Polidori) standing beside a fellow passenger on the plane in Society of the Snow.

Enzo Vogrincic As Numa Turcatti On His Knees In Society of the Snow

society-snow-gory-scenes-skip-timestamps-viewer-guide

Alive_1993_Image 1

Society of the Snow